From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Jul 24 11:01:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764729A99F6 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5985714A1; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NRZ00IC3O7QGN00@hades.sorbs.net>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 04:07:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <55B21AF0.1030806@sorbs.net> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:01:04 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Glen Barber Cc: herbert@oslo.ath.cx, Mark Linimon , freebsd-stable , Brandon Allbery , Jason Unovitch Subject: Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..? References: <55B17B7A.4080402@gmail.com> <20150723234805.GK84931@FreeBSD.org> <55B18488.9060602@sorbs.net> <20150724004026.GA1370@lonesome.com> <20150724004343.GM84931@FreeBSD.org> <20150724004443.GC1370@lonesome.com> <20150724004939.GN84931@FreeBSD.org> <55B18CA8.1020909@sorbs.net> <20150724010003.GO84931@FreeBSD.org> In-reply-to: <20150724010003.GO84931@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:01:08 -0000 Glen Barber wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:54:00AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > >> >> Actually I'm quite sucessfully running zfs on i386 (in a VM) ... here's >> the trick (which leads me to suspect ARC handling as the problem) - when >> I get to 512M of kernel space or less than 1G of RAM available system >> wide, I export/import the zfs pool... Using this formula I have uptimes >> of months... I haven't yet tried the 'ARC patch' that was proposed >> recently... >> >> > > Which FreeBSD version is this? Things changed since 10.1-RELEASE and > what will be 10.2-RELEASE enough that I can't even get a single-disk ZFS > system (in VirtualBox) to boot on i386. During 10.1-RELEASE testing, > I only saw problems with multi-disk setup (mirror, raidzN), but the > FreeBSD kernel grew since 10.1-RELEASE, so this is not unexpected. > 9.2-i386 and 9.3-i386 - I don't run 10 on anything. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/