From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 02:45:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A0116A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 02:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366E643D5C for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 02:45:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd02.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BIP9G-0005vI-06; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:45:06 +0200 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (S+Tj24ZB8enXDyWu6K5ZV6nAhANKK-V8eN59q3u-hb7ULEiqgPJmc3@[84.128.207.172]) by fmrl02.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1BIP8z-1gAVge0; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:44:49 +0200 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i3R9ijM8033489 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:44:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:45:31 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040427114531.1d9c5632@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200404270906.54407.current@schmalzbauer.de> References: <200404270906.54407.current@schmalzbauer.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: S+Tj24ZB8enXDyWu6K5ZV6nAhANKK-V8eN59q3u-hb7ULEiqgPJmc3@t-dialin.net Subject: Re: More than 8 labels per slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:45:08 -0000 On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:06:43 +0200 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Dear coders, > > is there any chance that FreeBSD can adopt the OpenBSD changes reagrding UFS > labels? I'm using one label per jail and this old 8 label limit forces me to > use different slices which sometimes, when I have to change label sizes, is a > big handicap. > Having 16 labels would improove the jail-handling greatly IMHO. Having 32 > labels (like I think NetBSD) was even greater, but lifting the 8 label limit > would suffice I think. Use vinum in the mean time. There you can have more than 32 partitions on one disk. Bye, Alexander. -- I'm available to get hired. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7