From owner-freebsd-mobile  Fri Jun  8  8: 2:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E993037B405
	for <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>; Fri,  8 Jun 2001 08:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nigel@9fs.org)
Received: from cotswold.demon.co.uk ([194.222.75.186] helo=nigel.9fs.org)
	by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 158Nna-0004mj-0X
	for freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:03:43 +0100
To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Subject: Wavelan driver and Windows 98
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:02:27 +0100
From: nigel@9fs.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E158Nna-0004mj-0X@anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-mobile.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-mobile>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-mobile>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

If I use the wavelan driver in adhoc mode,
and a Windows 98 laptop in "Peer to peer" mode,
is there any reason why they shouldn't communicate
when the ssids are the relevant settings (encryption,
ssid, channel) are the same?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message