From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 22 23:05:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D07BD9C; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 23:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6661C104; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 23:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id kl14so3878479pab.18 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:05:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lzE0rllTRrM3ZH19Dm0PtNQU1lZPp/Y1jWaEsV1B/ow=; b=s/RCXt4inbC05wjlFI2nforoUhHcD7tAwK5yhxvHIxYuGCwIUEd4z37AZkAOTHWPEX crU8Yie2qNhVFXRwsPgzAmrZpGY7+csdgUQCYaRlShWlKUTwWXSpIZ4IVL7085RTJ2GT 4rkBBYxWKth07J+0AXmRIuhA0GoUOhr//CDo9hMZJvv/8vK8ppsNo6F/frSiKw3g5RMf ulEXFewiFfxYe151oxCOnzq5pmruCH3XQMNUn4Plmpj20iHUZkPE4W4dN2FiCi0vDrNc ODRkChjY9rrACvdKDbz4/GPpeZyauSGjirTF7pDWJJV0awK52EvFuhvtHyPYRGQZX5uT eXoA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.106.130 with SMTP id gu2mr62515740pbb.59.1395529546085; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.66.0.164 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:05:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <532DFDB2.1090200@cyberleo.net> References: <532DC88A.7010104@marino.st> <532DFDB2.1090200@cyberleo.net> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:05:46 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YOVWivFkLSyKIpMRaEC7HQd4vQM Message-ID: Subject: Re: LPPL10 license consequences intended? (arabic/arabtex) From: Kevin Oberman To: CyberLeo Kitsana Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org Ports" , Nicola Vitale , marino@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 23:05:46 -0000 On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:16 PM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > On 03/22/2014 02:27 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:29 AM, John Marino >wrote: > > > >> In December, Nicola set the license for Arabtex to LPPL10. > >> The result is that the port is no longer packagable: > >> > >>> ====>> Ignoring arabic/arabtex: License LPPL10 needs confirmation, but > >> BATCH is defined > >>> build of /usr/ports/arabic/arabtex ended at Mon Mar 17 16:12:44 PDT > 2014 > >> > >> From a quick conversation on IRC, I got the idea that the license was > >> correct and many more Tex packages should also have this license. > >> If/when that happens, does that mean Tex packages are only to be built > >> from source? > >> > >> Is it correct that LPPL10 can't be built in a batch? > > No. You must accept the license before you can build the port, and you > cannot interactively accept a license in non-interactive batch mode. > > See the commments in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.mk for what to set in > make.conf to automatically accept certain licenses. > I have again looked over the LPPL and there is no language requiring explicit acceptance of the license that I can find. I see nothing about this more restrictive than LGPL or other standard licenses. Am I missing it? > -- > Fuzzy love, > -CyberLeo > Technical Administrator > CyberLeo.Net Webhosting > http://www.CyberLeo.Net > > > Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ > -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com