From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 17 07:35:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DF916A400; Wed, 17 May 2006 07:35:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CEF43D55; Wed, 17 May 2006 07:35:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179A91FFB21; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:35:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 9C0AC1FFACB; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C143F4448D6; Wed, 17 May 2006 07:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 07:32:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Erwin Lansing In-Reply-To: <20060516203131.GD83847@droso.net> Message-ID: <20060517073119.S54242@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20060516203131.GD83847@droso.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list Subject: Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for alpha removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 07:35:11 -0000 On Tue, 16 May 2006, Erwin Lansing wrote: Hi, > Do I really getting that old and need some glasses, or am I missing a > __FreeBSD_version bump for the removal of alpha? I'd be much obliged. there should be one from ip6fw removal that happened same time. Perhaps document it for both? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT