From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 1 14: 5:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from Post-Office.UH.EDU (Post-Office.UH.EDU [129.7.1.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA8815498 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 14:05:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zdenko@CS.UH.EDU) Received: from CS.UH.EDU (zeus.cs.uh.edu [129.7.192.1]) by Post-Office.UH.EDU (PMDF V5.2-29 #34071) with SMTP id <0F7X0095YRZN2P@Post-Office.UH.EDU> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:04:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from blackbird.CS.UH.EDU by CS.UH.EDU (COSC/UH-zeus) id AA24550; Mon, 01 Mar 1999 16:04:38 -0600 (CST) Received: by blackbird.CS.UH.EDU (4.1/UH-4.1) id AA01967; Mon, 01 Mar 1999 16:04:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 16:04:38 -0600 (CST) From: Zdenko Tomasic Subject: Re: several scsi controllers --> one bus? In-reply-to: <199902280945.KAA64375@peedub.muc.de> To: garyj@muc.de Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: zdenko@CS.UH.EDU Message-id: <9903012204.AA24550@CS.UH.EDU> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG yes, I was confused :=))). If bus designation is relative to its controller, it would imply that a single controller could drive several buses simultaneously. (i.e. it would be possible to have aha0 bus 0 target 0 unit 0 aha0 bus 1 target 0 unit 0 aha0 bus 2 target 0 unit 0 etc.) I did not think that possible, but than I am no SCSI expert. I rechecked situation of same SCSI ID's on different controllers and you are right. It was probably SCAM and cdrom with faulty scsi interface that got me confused about that(cdrom was not always visible on the bus). tnx. ZT To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message