From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 14 15:11:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C5215383; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 15:11:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA73607; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:10:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA56067; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:10:58 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199912142310.QAA56067@harmony.village.org> To: jack Subject: Re: sysinstall: is it really at the end of its lifecycle? Cc: Mike Smith , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:56:18 EST." References: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:10:58 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Personally, I like the speed of the current installation and wouldn't want to wait for X to start. It will triple my install setup time since right now I'm hardware speed limited (nearly) with sysinstall. It is much faster to draw the dialog boxes with libdialog than to start X. But I'm a mutant... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message