From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 23 00:09:50 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FAC679;
 Sun, 23 Mar 2014 00:09:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.cyberleo.net (mtumishi.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.201])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C75813;
 Sun, 23 Mar 2014 00:09:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.16.44.4] (vitani.den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130])
 by mail.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72F923E14;
 Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:09:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <532E264B.5020009@cyberleo.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:09:47 -0500
From: CyberLeo Kitsana <cyberleo@cyberleo.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: LPPL10 license consequences intended? (arabic/arabtex)
References: <532DC88A.7010104@marino.st>
 <CAN6yY1uf67ogKyqNO025+pcU21PmFYCiQULd4z6TsaYbFma3_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <532DFDB2.1090200@cyberleo.net>
 <CAN6yY1t0X+YE9s10wi0spV7_H4BDPks+C_UwXdZsd9Wnbh_+FA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1t0X+YE9s10wi0spV7_H4BDPks+C_UwXdZsd9Wnbh_+FA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org Ports" <ports@freebsd.org>,
 Nicola Vitale <nivit@freebsd.org>, marino@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 00:09:50 -0000

On 03/22/2014 06:05 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:16 PM, CyberLeo Kitsana <cyberleo@cyberleo.net>wrote:
> 
>> On 03/22/2014 02:27 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:29 AM, John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st
>>> wrote:
<snip>
>>>> Is it correct that LPPL10 can't be built in a batch?
>>
>> No. You must accept the license before you can build the port, and you
>> cannot interactively accept a license in non-interactive batch mode.
<snip>
> 
> I have again looked over the LPPL and there is no language requiring
> explicit acceptance of the license that I can find. I see nothing about
> this more restrictive than LGPL or other standard licenses.
> 
> Am I missing it?

I was elucidating from the point of view of the ports license
infrastructure, not the point of view of a lawyer.

The code expects you to accept the license, and will not proceed until
you do. It's not my call whether or not it is legal for FreeBSD to
accept this license on behalf of the user.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net
<CyberLeo@CyberLeo.Net>

Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/