From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 4 14:30:05 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6546F16A421 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5582613C4E1 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lB4EU56I086399 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:30:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lB4EU5S8086398; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:30:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:30:05 GMT Message-Id: <200712041430.lB4EU5S8086398@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Matthias Schmidt Cc: Subject: Re: ports/118397: New Port: ports-mgmt/pkg_search - A nifty script searching the ports database X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Schmidt List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:30:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/118397; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Matthias Schmidt To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Romain_Tarti=E8re?= Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/118397: New Port: ports-mgmt/pkg_search - A nifty script searching the ports database Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:01:27 +0100 Hi, On 04.12.2007, at 14:52, Romain Tarti=E8re wrote: > Index filename depends on which FreeBSD version you are running. The > attached patch attempt to auto-detect this name instead of relying =20 > on a > hard coded value. This is a known bug and fixed in Version 1.1 (-> website). Once =20 pkg_search is added as a port, I'm planning to bumb PORTVERSION. Or =20 should I submit a patch with the new PORTVERSION right now? Regards, Matthias --=20 Dipl.-Inf. Matthias Schmidt Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, Distributed Systems Group Philipps-University of Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Strasse, 35032 Marburg Tel: +49-6421-2821591, Fax: +49-6421-2821573, Office C4347