From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 11 21:35:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EA816A4CE; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:35:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (darkness.comp.waw.pl [195.117.238.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BC343D46; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:35:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009) id BE9BDAC956; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:35:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:35:44 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20050311213544.GH9291@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <20050311110234.GA87255@cell.sick.ru> <20050311141450.GF9291@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20050311142805.GB88801@cell.sick.ru> <42320A3E.1020708@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/rPfFJkZbotMxBE6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42320A3E.1020708@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386 cc: dima <_pppp@mail.ru> cc: John Baldwin cc: Luigi Rizzo cc: rwatson@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Giant-free polling [PATCH] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:35:48 -0000 --/rPfFJkZbotMxBE6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:14:38PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: +> >P> There is still an unresolved problem (in your and our patch as well)= of +> >P> using ifnet structure fields without synchronization, as we don't ha= ve +> >P> access tointerface's internal mutex, which protects those fields. +> >=20 +> > +>=20 +> you need to add an interface method that has access to it.. I was thinking more about moving interface mutex into ifnet structure, but Robert has some objections IIRC. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --/rPfFJkZbotMxBE6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCMg8wForvXbEpPzQRAkh/AKCj0CedBDkj1J1iiJrMEFeg0aNgIQCeNUtP C7m3RyQzPgBy/WKLQCUaPho= =2mCX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/rPfFJkZbotMxBE6--