From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 29 22:16:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761AFA9D for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCDBB34 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id r0TMG1l9075897; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:16:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r0TMG0Lc075896; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:16:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:16:00 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Konstantin Belousov Subject: Re: Fast gettimeofday(2) and static linking Message-ID: <20130129221600.GG85306@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20130125123554.GQ2522@kib.kiev.ua> <20130128154516.GA59472@alchemy.franken.de> <20130128155524.GS2522@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130128155524.GS2522@kib.kiev.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:16:08 -0000 On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:55:24PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:45:17PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:35:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > Bruce Evans reported that statically linked binaries on HEAD an stable/9 > > > use the syscall for gettimeofday(2) and clock_gettime(2). Apparently, this > > > is due to my use of the weak reference to the __vdso* symbols in the > > > libc implementations. > > > > > > Patch below reworks the __vdso* attributes to only make the symbols > > > weak, but keep the references strong. Since I have to add a stub for > > > each architecture, I would like to ask non-x86 machines owners to test > > > the patch. > > > > > > > Hi Konstantin, > > > > what's the appropriate way to test this? > > Please rebuild the world with the patch and check that gettimeofday(2) still > works on your architecture, both for the static and dynamic binaries. > I think that just booting multiuser is enough. Okay, looks good on sparc64 (tested with a dynamically as well as a statically built time(1)). Marius