From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  3 07:59:21 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E411ED3
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  3 Jun 2014 07:59:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D1F2981
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  3 Jun 2014 07:59:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s537xKcC086532
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:59:20 +0100 (BST)
 (envelope-from no-reply-bugzilla-daemon@freebsd.org)
From: no-reply-bugzilla-daemon@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 175947] [NEW PORT] www/sogo: Groupware server with a focus on
 scalability and open standards
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 07:59:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: theraven@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-175947-13-TuxAaRwnPr@http.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-175947-13@http.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-175947-13@http.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 07:59:21 -0000

http://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175947

--- Comment #4 from David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> ---
I looked at it on 9.2 with the gnustep ports.  It did a few things that are
incompatible with the new ABI, which I fixed (I think those are mostly upstream
now).  If it (and SOPE) can now work in this configuration, then I'd happily
review a port.  I'm still somewhat concerned that several of the compiler
warnings pointed to security vulnerabilities and I don't think Inverse took all
of these patches.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.