From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 23 11:15:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4DEDF2D for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C6A8CCA for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MePcd-1Wk4Ac17Hj-00QDBq for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:15:25 +0100 Message-ID: <532EC253.1020909@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:15:31 +0100 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port version problem References: <20140323070513.537fcee0@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20140323070513.537fcee0@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Q2btfyDc3rWrjbqdu1nj0o1QD6QNoPDQ4Dq96OcmE2Vly+mjkR0 Tmog18AWv2jKjSRWaFDq5MGAoBKfqaVAZw4zxcK6+zANbR5T18GMvrlGZ1Zxi1EAvFJch8M 3MvcPXvFv/oZqtiBHCUhx3rA3LR3pPjAGDpo2NudZwJFWi+77py9p6riX8BsyVOm6F8PWdG wiJeeSmP9VKurcl2Dp30w== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:15:27 -0000 On 2014-03-23 12:05, Jerry wrote: > When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree: > > /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL= > > It produced the following output: > > dri-9.1.7_3,2 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_3,2) > libEGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1) > libGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_4) > libdrm-2.4.50 > succeeds index (index has 2.4.17_1) > xf86-video-ati-7.2.0_1 > succeeds index (index has 6.14.6_1) > xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_1 > succeeds index (index has 2.7.1_6) > xorg-server-1.12.4_4,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.7.7_11,1) > > How is that even possible? I don't recall seeing anything in UPDATING that > referred to this. > The param -I checks against /usr/ports/INDEX(-n) to speed up comparing. Do you use portsnap or cvs to update the ports tree? portsnap should automatically update the INDEX file unless the setting in /etc/portsnap.conf was changed. In case subversion is used, the INDEX is only updated with the following command $> make fetchindex -C /usr/ports