From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 23 11:33:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E6752B5 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1BD4E2A for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id as1so4156649iec.25 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:33:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gizLM9AV13yXcOAvzmvxiuVidLJo9rbUfZdKQ1KsCtg=; b=s+hwLiaZavXZd0ebgxh8vHRcgiwil41uu5ivEjCX3lCjgKb3ghjpb84WH+CZNDWbOA Sziu3xITXbTrDHPCf2QjlJkzmM2rR2opNsIzMme/7DSbjHREuvG8Rep3oPGOc/9O0Mfs DK+rtT/pTBaIvwjU5twrZhIe+JuwuvWmnCfKj37NifavsTCfQQ9dIPlMoMBbGQlyOa3u 2MwcIWhO5AtbjSvkZ5+9ybELPsQFhuAspcLNqwdMf7Az35fCsEE2U4x3jkIGcyHgEC/l U3tPpRsMFFLfcSQrcZj1Pen2oC5bBSKK/iFboyYiVFHWrrnh7CYB91rHpVhgBNu/8BaK 9Psg== X-Received: by 10.50.61.65 with SMTP id n1mr6440002igr.32.1395574392311; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:33:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (173-18-81-139.client.mchsi.com. [173.18.81.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l7sm16369785igv.4.2014.03.23.04.33.10 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:33:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:33:09 -0500 From: Duane Hill X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <251297043.20140323063309@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port version problem In-Reply-To: <532EC253.1020909@gmx.de> References: <20140323070513.537fcee0@scorpio> <532EC253.1020909@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:33:13 -0000 On Sunday, March 23, 2014, 6:15:31 AM, olli wrote: > On 2014-03-23 12:05, Jerry wrote: >> When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree: >> >> /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL= >> >> It produced the following output: >> >> dri-9.1.7_3,2 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_3,2) >> libEGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1) >> libGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_4) >> libdrm-2.4.50 > succeeds index (index has 2.4.17_1) >> xf86-video-ati-7.2.0_1 > succeeds index (index has 6.14.6_1) >> xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_1 > succeeds index (index has 2.7.1_6) >> xorg-server-1.12.4_4,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.7.7_11,1) >> >> How is that even possible? I don't recall seeing anything in UPDATING that >> referred to this. >> > The param -I checks against /usr/ports/INDEX(-n) to speed up comparing. > Do you use portsnap or cvs to update the ports tree? > portsnap should automatically update the INDEX file unless the > setting in /etc/portsnap.conf was changed. > In case subversion is used, the INDEX is only updated with the following command $>> make fetchindex -C /usr/ports Or rebuild indexes from the ports directory: # cd /usr/ports && make index -- Duane Hill duihi77@gmail.com "If at first you don't succeed, so much for sky diving."