From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 17 12:46:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A6F106566C for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C728FC16 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1R4u2o-0006s8-Ov>; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:30:54 +0200 Received: from e178015066.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.15.66] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1R4u2o-00050u-Kv>; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:30:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4E7492FE.2090506@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:30:54 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110916 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Carlson References: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4E73C163.9040601@llnl.gov> In-Reply-To: <4E73C163.9040601@llnl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.15.66 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM modules -> LDAP! X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:46:30 -0000 On 09/16/11 23:36, Mike Carlson wrote: > On 09/16/2011 08:05 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> We currently have a number of PAM modules in ports, and while some of >> them are specific to certain third-party software, many aren't. I >> believe we would benefit from importing at least some of these into >> base. My question is: which ones? >> >> DES > LDAP support out of the box would be fantastic. > > Mike C > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Also a strong vote for LDAP support. LDAP is our backend for several server systems and it is a kind of pain having to think first for the ports to be installed. Also I suspect and hope a better integration if LDAP gets part of the core system. Regards, Oliver