From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 12 15:46:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EC9C02 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from surajswami10@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1C16E1 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id o13so75565qaj.15 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:46:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9ELBzY5sggX3CNXTpFmt378zQsWstQlCyLLPpauHkG0=; b=K2hau1GeTgSTka9K5q3rbEIdxSaNcanIzc2bJlUa1U9QttqL09rkLmyfaPMWj2P1WN pD7J6CMAszJO0mOHG/caMXMGRn6n1uEy6BUKdR09rvf5Ag6Pr0Cu0QcU0V3yopcUSE8Z wcJNUFUTCAMcTb/rSoaDWB/Sf3ZdIDk6nwrtsK4xDIsSV8OK+b+9V5tAcbK8zy8il7fV y3jj7gNx+TK3Azwo0ut7E4pXfOmHTUCB6i7X99xGkTCdkvlhywnrJo7HQmZbAPy+lOca Se35MbgOaiMgv5qPadXMDEmcLiY6yCK5HfhAJvxNDwbOwRuqGkqIiyuhy1vqflEyeRrY TLeQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.178.84 with SMTP id bl20mr5391653qcb.125.1363103170207; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:46:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.49.7 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:46:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <513EB3B4.3060704@mu.org> <513F44B6.8010208@mu.org> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:46:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Help: Getting started with bhyve From: suraj swaminathan To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:46:16 -0000 Ok I see my misconception. That helped. Thanks for the Help Guys. On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 12 March 2013 11:28, suraj swaminathan wrote: > > I have intel i5 processor. Hence i386 version. > > I believe there is some confusion here. > > There is i386 for x86 processors. > There is amd64 for x86-64 processors. The name "amd64" is because > they were the first one to produce a 64 bit ISA compatible with x86 > processors. > > -- > Eitan Adler >