From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 23 12:16:33 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE5CFBB
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:16:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67D311C7
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:16:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MhAVV-1Wnt2U1q6L-00MO0K for
 <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 13:16:31 +0100
Message-ID: <532ED0A6.6000600@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 13:16:38 +0100
From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Port version problem
References: <20140323070513.537fcee0@scorpio> <532EC253.1020909@gmx.de>
 <20140323073920.346d8f9e@scorpio> <532EC89E.6000607@gmx.de>
 <20140323080241.4f566561@scorpio>
In-Reply-To: <20140323080241.4f566561@scorpio>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:drhZt+e6ArSlEZJkUa/dD1IUvO6OR1PZM2R+/J8zMpK8rxbOdtg
 5MfJeJ2AacqEYt+rMVj/CPOT2Y5qhN1Q8g4STCdAqEIzYiVwSXyT/xvQEj6mpBiAy5EETGJ
 mjNd8QWd36JTjM/qbkguf9eiJk5MxgNlVON4RiBPTcbc9H0WZR9ii3IWnUTTB6+3CYE+GcF
 3XTxRCluPgx/Dmn9Zd0rA==
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:16:33 -0000

On 2014-03-23 13:02, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:42:22 +0100, Matthias Andree stated:
> 
>> Am 23.03.2014 12:39, schrieb Jerry:
>>
>>> /usr/sbin/portsnap fetch update
>>> /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
>>> /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
>>>
>>> I just reran those command and it produced the exact same results.
>>
>> portsdb is irrelevant here, did you check portsnap output, did it
>> succeed?  Is your system clock plausible?  Did portsnap rebuild the
>> INDEX file?
>>
>> Otherwise, try: make fetchindex -C /usr/ports
> 
> I tried your suggestion with negative results. Any other ideas?
> 


As Matthew has already written you are running with WITH_NEW_XORG
but the INDEX is generated without this flag.

>From x11-servers/xorg-server/Makefile

.if defined(WITH_NEW_XORG)
XORG_VERSION=   1.12.4
XORG_REVISION=  4
.else
XORG_VERSION=   1.7.7
XORG_REVISION=  11
...


If you run only the command
$> pkg version -vL=
it should calculate the version correct.

-- 
Regards,
olli