From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec  2 18:42:23 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BE6241
 for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Dec 2012 18:42:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-da0-f54.google.com (mail-da0-f54.google.com
 [209.85.210.54])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224928FC08
 for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Dec 2012 18:42:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-da0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n2so951207dad.13
 for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 10:42:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=tNHHNTvDWy9hkEmAXt18uihOd3JyVSN5r0Q/2E5AH84=;
 b=ccvjHX4gnFhOk68p86atDU7qo6EtEpuZfQ2VRAelv6/7fZ20EPci8Qtco5l3FdL7z0
 YJJA2ZkG1lPz5D2JF2GhAyG40dCg4VlhLjVUwtJGoZtjSe+nzM4y/BYnysVGQe/Juebd
 +nKEIhLbosAaI2lTwfYM/SCcJuvBulF4g8f3jpQH4bJ4xUU8FrmIg5GgsSD4h0Rbcr56
 5SFuFRtqaIt27TrUkWr2Y1xrliLyrZyzKhr3WcauljbbcuoZ1CJZLKVHi2MMMHhaXqYA
 8GqNi1/RH6iMNk0SesdolUg46M/h4GkYB7elp1gEHgDG52LTHyjnajgkXV8vYsWXDnY4
 /Hfw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.240.233 with SMTP id wd9mr22851630pbc.127.1354473741651;
 Sun, 02 Dec 2012 10:42:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.8.2 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:42:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.8.2 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:42:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0316C1AC163245A1808EC0001AFCF048@yahoo.com>
References: <33ED1440B7AE4229B166A4CE4C131DF6@yahoo.com>
 <CAFpgnrPi140TaSTyz_5XHDQSc_pxTsLhOAsjq-6yC2gN-8kd-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <0316C1AC163245A1808EC0001AFCF048@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:42:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFpgnrO-bZwdbLgRyqPwj5_+GGMooZjVCpMYdZVetHSN-6GNuA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pf rules vs DHCP
From: Kevin Wilcox <kevin.wilcox@gmail.com>
To: Laszlo Danielisz <laszlo_danielisz@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
 \(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-pf>,
 <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
 <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:42:23 -0000

On Dec 2, 2012 12:55 PM, "Laszlo Danielisz" <laszlo_danielisz@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> @Kevin, yes I'm using interfaces, is there any what not using them in
pf.conf?

I don't think so. I was replying by phone at the time so it was a little
short, I meant if you were using the interface in the rule versus defining
a macro and using it. It's the same syntax, I just didn't want someone new
to pf to read it and think

pass in on $int_if

would automatically work.

kmw