From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 14 16:56:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151B51065672; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEAE8FC08; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from straycat.dhs.org (tmclaugh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5EGuBh8095442; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:56:12 GMT (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from tomcat.straycat.dhs.org (tomcat.straycat.dhs.org [192.168.3.130]) by straycat.dhs.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n5EGti2w003570; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:55:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A352B8B.3080104@sdf.lonestar.org> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:55:39 -0400 From: Tom McLaughlin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Vogel References: <20090606162235.GA49444@triton.kn-bremen.de> <2a41acea0906091104q17aeb174l8a34bf7464a80509@mail.gmail.com> <20090609195141.GA4982@triton.kn-bremen.de> <2a41acea0906091412k4fc58f4dt2c4ebbbb6dbd46dd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0906091412k4fc58f4dt2c4ebbbb6dbd46dd@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock Subject: Re: flash10 vs f10; em(4) now broken in -current in qemu/vbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:56:13 -0000 Jack Vogel wrote, On 06/09/2009 05:12 PM: > Your change would work, but as its shared code and there are other OS's and > their issues to worry about, what I am going to do is a bit different. I am > including > a patch if you would try this now, there will be a full driver update soon. > > Anyone set up to test this please post your results here. > > Cheers, > > Jack > Thanks for the patch Jack. My em device on VMware ESXi 3.5u4 is back again. :) tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org |