From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 30 08:58:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A1116A41F for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: from people.fsn.hu (people.fsn.hu [195.228.252.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B689843D49 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B80884420; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:58:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from people.fsn.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (people.fsn.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 62354-01-2; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:58:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.2.3]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4024D8441E; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:58:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <438D69C1.3030304@fsn.hu> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:58:41 +0100 From: Attila Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?U8O4cmVuIFNjaG1pZHQ=?= References: <438ACA94.6090606@fsn.hu> <438B12EA.6030100@deepcore.dk> <438B3883.7090205@samsco.org> <438B3C5F.2060500@deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <438B3C5F.2060500@deepcore.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fsn.hu Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DMA failures on AMD64 with 4 GB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:58:51 -0000 Hello, Søren Schmidt wrote: > Please mark ATA as broken for > 4G of memory then, I have no immediate > plans to rework the entire logic to bend over backwards for busdma's > callback centric world just yet. What will happen? - ATA will be broken for >= 4 GB RAM forever - (as Søren requested) busdma will be fixed (whatever it means) If nothing from the above two, would it be possible to either revert the changes made after october 8 at least for RELENG_6 or to workaround the >=4 GB memory case? Thanks, -- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Adopt a directory on our free software phone: +3630 306 6758 server! http://www.fsn.hu/?f=brick