From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 19 20:55:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E6910656DB; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E678FC24; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id CA15B1E002B2; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:55:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from triton.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6JKsBjG036854; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:54:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@triton.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by triton.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6JKsAJB035652; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:54:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:54:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <200907192054.n6JKsAJB035652@triton.kn-bremen.de> To: glen.j.barber@gmail.com X-Newsgroups: local.list.freebsd.doc In-Reply-To: <4ad871310907191211i7fb8a7f5qb146ed8b2038f06e@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A5C5F13.7030607@FreeBSD.org> <4A5D5ED7.5000101@freebsd.org> <20090717215636.GA1141@arthur.nitro.dk> <4A61733D.9010702@FreeBSD.org> <4A62D333.9090203@otenet.gr> <20090719113438.07c05110.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20090719164310.GD1164@arthur.nitro.dk> <4A6353CE.7060403@FreeBSD.org> Organization: home X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:28:10 +0000 Cc: Tom Rhodes , doc@freebsd.org, pgj@freebsd.org, daichi@freebsd.org, "Simon L. Nielsen" , scrappy@hub.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, keramida@freebsd.org, rene@freebsd.org, Manolis Kiagias Subject: qemu (was: Re: [PATCH] Add a VirtualBox section to Handbook's 'Virtualization' chapter) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:55:51 -0000 In article <4ad871310907191211i7fb8a7f5qb146ed8b2038f06e@mail.gmail.com> you write: >On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > >[really big snip] > >> >> This is a good point, and one I have not actually considered. >> I believe Qemu is not mentioned anywhere in the Handbook and I guess it >> deserves a place here. >> > >While it is not mentioned in the Handbook, there is a Wiki page about >Qemu [1]. Out of curiosity however, I remember nox@ mentioning that >KQemu will no longer be developed [2]. My interpretation of that >announcement was that Qemu will no longer be developed as well. Is >this incorrect? Actually it is, qemu itself is very much alive and kicking, its just its virtualization support that has moved focus from kqemu to kvm. (And yes we really could use an up-to-date and working port for that...) HTH, Juergen