From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 20:40:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CDC16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:40:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F29D743D48 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:40:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.171.3.164 with login) by smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2005 20:40:58 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, infofarmer@mail.ru Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:40:54 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050326224344.4152110C83@relay2.beelinegprs.ru> <86oed2veqd.fsf@xps.des.no> <424B04CC.8060909@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <424B04CC.8060909@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503301240.56680.krinklyfig@spymac.com> cc: Phil Brennan cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= cc: Sarunas Vancevicius Subject: Re: About FreeBSD and Solaris X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:40:59 -0000 On Wednesday 30 March 2005 11:58, "Andrew P." wrote: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > Phil Brennan writes: > >>This mysql benchmark includes solaris 10 and freebsd 5.3. Its a > >> month or two old now, but its the only one I've seen. Dag-Erling, > >> how does this show solaris to be slow on x86? It certainly isn't > >> slow compared to freebsd. > > > > Please use something else than MySQL as benchmark, as MySQL has > > well-known issues with FreeBSD's threading model. > > Latest talk on the Net suggests that freebsd is a > perfect choice for mysql-based database, but you > should compile it (mysql) with linux threads enabled. > > I think Yahoo has used mysql on freebsd for years > on end. They have switched their core db units to > linux-oracle, though. That last part makes sense. Oracle is an obvious choice for what they would need. I'm curious to see what difference compiling MySQL with Linux threads would have, although if the problem is threading, then that makes sense, too. - jt