From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 25 10:23:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201DB106566C; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de) Received: from zivm-relay1.uni-muenster.de (ZIVM-RELAY1.UNI-MUENSTER.DE [128.176.192.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5E08FC13; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:23:25 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,269,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="303246467" Received: from zivmaildisp1.uni-muenster.de (HELO ZIVMAILUSER01.UNI-MUENSTER.DE) ([128.176.188.85]) by zivm-relay1.uni-muenster.de with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2010 12:23:25 +0200 Received: by ZIVMAILUSER01.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (Postfix, from userid 149459) id 5D1E71B0769; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:23:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:23:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Best Sender: Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster To: Jaakko Heinonen , Andriy Gapon , Scott Long Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20100423140037.GA5851@a91-153-117-195.elisa-laajakaista.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Switchover to CAM ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:23:27 -0000 Jaakko Heinonen schrieb am 2010-04-23: > On 2010-04-23, Alexander Best wrote: > > has anybody thought about adding scsi support to burncd(8)? i've > > been using > > ATA CAM for quite a while now and really love it. however i miss > > burncd(8). > I have thought about it. The mail I posted in December didn't > generate > any interest. i'm sorry i didn't notice your mail back then. i'm very interested in using burncd on a pass(4) device and would like to test any patches you may have. another option would be to have a ata(4)->cam(4)->ata(4) emulation. layer (the opposite of the current ATA_CAM option). that way all ata binaries would continue to work. what /dev/ata* would be used for is to receive ata commands, convert them to cam commands and then send them to pass. i wrote a mail with the idea to freebsd-questions@, but also got no response [1]. [1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg229439.html > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091214182645.GA2764 -- Alexander Best