From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan  4 09:33:02 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D0A16A418;
	Fri,  4 Jan 2008 09:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C619713C45B;
	Fri,  4 Jan 2008 09:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971C020BC;
	Fri,  4 Jan 2008 10:32:53 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: -0.2/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891F020A0;
	Fri,  4 Jan 2008 10:32:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 4B36B844CD; Fri,  4 Jan 2008 10:32:53 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
References: <477C82F0.5060809@freebsd.org> <863ateemw2.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080104002002.L30578@fledge.watson.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:32:53 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20080104002002.L30578@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's
	message of "Fri\, 4 Jan 2008 00\:26\:31 +0000 \(GMT\)")
Message-ID: <86wsqqaqbe.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org>,
	Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: sbrk(2) broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:33:02 -0000

Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> The right answer is presumably to introduce a new LIMIT_SWAP, which
> limits the allocation of anonymous memory by processes, and size it to
> something like 90% of swap space by default.

Not a good solution on its own.  You need a per-process limit as well,
otherwise a malloc() bomb will still cause other processes to fail
randomly.

> Since that won't be happening before 7.0, I believe the consensus is
> to simply not MFC the changes for 7 and proceed with the release.

Thank you :)

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no