From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 30 09:02:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A05216A41F for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:02:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F33243D6B for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:02:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x7so2672987nzc for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:02:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l2LnLhIM5TLCUB1YPpRDsaslot3rvrtRQ/atdDpBPV+Iw6f4jqG8/BPUhKTsGeQXZjqa2FKMOlj319+wWsyYqqsWbg5Y23ivLpGsfJ3c6+TURkPwNqj3IS4RbiSbRcmo8vVs/zttensAVtVVrGWETMesWNT/vFXfPCBGX4GyAAo= Received: by 10.65.43.12 with SMTP id v12mr1869557qbj; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:02:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.192.14 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:02:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:02:14 +0100 From: Claus Guttesen To: Jason Evans In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New libc malloc patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:02:45 -0000 > There is a patch that contains a new libc malloc implementation at: > > http://www.canonware.com/~jasone/jemalloc/jemalloc_20051127a.diff > > This implementation is very different from the current libc malloc. > Probably the most important difference is that this one is designed > with threads and SMP in mind. Do you need current for this? I patched and tried buildworld on 6.0 stable but no go. regards Claus