From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 27 19:56:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57747106568D; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout024.mac.com (asmtpout024.mac.com [17.148.16.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE708FC16; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:56:22 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Received: from macbook-pro.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KS600E1GVDI4X20@asmtp024.mac.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:56:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Marcel Moolenaar In-reply-to: <20091027191258.GU27159@alchemy.franken.de> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:56:06 -0700 Message-id: <767E6364-0F58-447F-A6EA-9E08A8065C8F@mac.com> References: <200910211838.n9LIc2wp007206@svn.freebsd.org> <20091025202541.GC94979@alchemy.franken.de> <36313C38-9B60-4BF3-885C-5BAAA915DCFE@mac.com> <20091026201116.GS27159@alchemy.franken.de> <63FB238C-D66F-486B-AB5B-DA7C2423A78B@mac.com> <20091027191258.GU27159@alchemy.franken.de> To: Marius Strobl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r198341 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 arm/arm arm/mv i386/i386 i386/xen ia64/ia64 kern mips/mips powerpc/aim powerpc/booke powerpc/include powerpc/powerpc sparc64/sparc64 sun4v/sun4v vm X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:56:22 -0000 On Oct 27, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: >> I concur. Do we have any spitfire-based sparc64 boxes in the >> cluster or do you have one? > > Do you want something particularly tested on a spitfire-based > machine? Any I-cache related change, really. My Netra is not going to tell me anything. I'm fine leaving it up to spitfire-based sparc64 owners to fill in the gaps, but I generally prefer to be as complete as possible when making infrastructure changes. FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com