From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 11:30:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA53A6D for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24E7DF5F for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hm4so5995697wib.2 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 04:30:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mJmLvXVuOGXu0vRd/xfzsOne88ToaJUJNOFL85aOh0s=; b=unGWUIo+ntxDtfAK+fbYeGfYvE/TOaab8KmQMpa2nIwuNyOPG5SqLdQ4+pcDmoS8Mm G0qa99zVLsYgImvgtvwP5DATIqqd4Ppv5sq5gHIysDJDHDQdmaJXl5Uc4oTs166d7pvy v0Ccms6I5x8gv0SG2ckxOgY50Gu2eA2CeaPrq7jFix6VsBtgBrNSas1WMwRvSVLoX5Ta 21q1PCkC/KzpVkqolneTisaOzoNYsDrLmdkkeag6LWpyJGOgJzHkyFTBcPZl6Ll2zC4g IS7S7tZ9dT694PcJUHF+pPNNnFX4uM7RWvvBQgm0PN9gZ7Jds2nBNuTsXkGMK+9rMjCF oHuw== X-Received: by 10.194.6.106 with SMTP id z10mr41270896wjz.1.1396870204843; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 04:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.54] (LNantes-156-74-19-50.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr. [82.127.90.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ea8sm9207363wib.11.2014.04.07.04.30.04 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Apr 2014 04:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53428C30.9010308@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:29:52 +0200 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Richard Stallman remains hypocritical liar? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 11:30:07 -0000 On 04/04/2014 22:08, Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos wrote: > Richard Stallman remains hypocritical liar? http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119750352332512&w=2 > What is the position of the developers BSD about Richard Stallman? > This is a very old thread... In short, RMS said on the OpenBSD mailing list that it's not a free operating system because you can install non-free software (e.g adobe flash). But, the OpenBSD developers answered that the Emacs distribution (kind funny) contains code to work on Windows. Also some other GNU/Linux distributions provides ways to install non-free software as well and RMS bless them (because they donated to FSF which OpenBSD didn't). Now, no need to start the flame again :-). Regards, David.