From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 25 18:20:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931FF106566B for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 18:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBF78FC16 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 18:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4PIKQKe040632; Mon, 25 May 2009 20:20:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n4PIKPET040629; Mon, 25 May 2009 20:20:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 20:20:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Graeme Dargie In-Reply-To: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F7897392956CC@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> Message-ID: References: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F7897392956CC@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Howard Jones , FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org, Valentin Bud Subject: RE: FreeBSD & Software RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:20:35 -0000 > but of course lots of people like to make their life harder > > No I am not making life harder at all ... I have 6x500gb hard disks I > want in a good solid raid 5 type configuration. So you are somewhat wide > of the mark in your assumptions. that's a reason. just don't forget that RAID-z is MUCH closer to RAID3 than RAID5. so you get random access speed of single drive, just higher transfer.