From owner-freebsd-isdn Wed Jun 14 13:30:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from peedub.muc.de (p3E9B8F28.dip.t-dialin.net [62.155.143.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0E137C267 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 13:30:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.muc.de) Received: from peedub.muc.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.muc.de (8.9.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA38231; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 22:25:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200006142025.WAA38231@peedub.muc.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: David Wetzel Cc: "Leif Neland" , freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: reject Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jun 2000 02:57:51 +0200." <200006140057.CAA00284@cat.turbocat.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 22:25:50 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Wetzel writes: >> From: "Leif Neland" > >what you want is a very fast answering machine :-) > >the code that decides if i4b should answer a call is not very clever but I >had not time to enhance this jet. > Wait a second. If you have 2 devices on an S0 bus responding to the same number then I would expect a race condition to result. It doesn't seem reasonable to me to expect isdnd to reject calls for other devices on the bus. In fact, I would suspect that it would violate some standard. IMHO that's a function which a PBX should carry out. --- Gary Jennejohn / garyj@muc.de gj@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message