From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 17 0:10:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from area51.fremont.ca.us (c158457-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com [24.9.169.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9943A14D8D for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:10:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mharo@area51.fremont.ca.us) Received: (from mharo@localhost) by area51.fremont.ca.us (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA67702; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:07:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mharo) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:07:22 -0700 From: Michael Haro To: Bill Fumerola Cc: Mike Tancsa , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.3-RELEASE RELNOTES.TXT Message-ID: <19990917000722.B67426@FreeBSD.org> Reply-To: mharo@FreeBSD.ORG References: <4.1.19990916213429.05c081e0@granite.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Bill Fumerola on Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 08:34:11PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 08:34:11PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > ------------ > > The proftpd port has been updated with the latest patches to prevent > > possible remote root exploits. > > ------------ > > > > Was it not marked 'unsafe' instead ? > > FORBIDDEN, I thought. The buzz on BUGTRAQ is that no version of proftpd > is safe still, and exploits are on the way. The port was updated and then more security holes were found. And I have a updated local copy and even more security holes were found. In theory a new proftpd release will be out tomorrow or the next day with all the holes patched, including the holes mentioned on BUGTRAQ. Michael To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message