From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 4 10:03:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA12821 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 10:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.netxpress.com (ns2.netxpress.com [205.218.168.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA12811 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 10:03:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from SANDMAN.NETXPRESS.COM (sandman.netxpress.com [205.218.169.42]) by ns2.netxpress.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with SMTP id MAA08589 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 12:02:14 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <32A5BCB5.1825@netxpress.com> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 1996 12:02:29 -0600 From: Sean Burchell Reply-To: burchs@netxpress.com Organization: NetXpress Internet Services X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: problems with win95 telnet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I telnet from win95 using win95's telnet but I cannot find a good termcap entry to use for win95 telnets vt100 emulation...could someone please point me to the proper termcap entry or give me patches to an existing vt100 termcap entry to help it work well with windows 95 telnet? I am unable to find any information on this in the FAQs even though I would think it would be desperately needed.