From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 17:41:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7810516A41F; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:41:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from viefep17-int.chello.at (viefep17-int.chello.at [213.46.255.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C05943D5C; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:41:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from wombat.fafoe.narf.at ([213.47.85.26]) by viefep17-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20051018174132.QQFO27295.viefep17-int.chello.at@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:41:32 +0200 Received: by wombat.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E5B45185; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:41:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:41:30 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20051018174123.GX67914@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> References: <200510181724.j9IHO3kp094419@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200510181724.j9IHO3kp094419@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen sem.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:41:37 -0000 On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 05:24:03PM +0000, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > stefanf 2005-10-18 17:24:03 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > lib/libc/gen sem.c > Log: > Make __sem_timedwait() consistent with the sem_timedwait() prototype. We have a quite few cases where we declare foo() in the header and define _foo() or __foo() in the .c file. Should such functions be added to namespace.h?