From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 25 14:14: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD0214DFE for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 14:14:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA13731; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 14:03:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdc13716; Thu Feb 25 22:03:21 1999 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 14:03:07 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: John Polstra Cc: dot@dotat.at, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mount -o union broken recently? In-Reply-To: <199902252147.NAA01813@vashon.polstra.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, John Polstra wrote: [...] > > Here, you did the union mount on top of an existing mount point (da1). > I don't know for sure, but I suspect that this is the only case in > which union mounts are designed to work. I was led to believe (last time I read the code) that any directory should be ok for a union mount.... julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message