From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 04:02:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C7916A4B3; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F77F43FE1; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:02:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA23375; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:02:32 +1000 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:01:10 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" In-Reply-To: <20030930074500.GY45668@wantadilla.lemis.com> Message-ID: <20030930204919.A4354@gamplex.bde.org> References: <20030929083007.GA33083@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030930074500.GY45668@wantadilla.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: Serial debug broken in recent -CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:02:38 -0000 On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Tuesday, 30 September 2003 at 16:23:35 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > > >> After building a new kernel, remote serial gdb no longer works. When > >> I issue a 'continue' command, I lose control of the system, but it > >> doesn't continue running. Has anybody else seen this? > > > > It works as well as it did a few months ago here. (Not very well compared > > with ddb. E.g., calling a function is usually fatal.) > > Hmm, that's not what Sam or I are seeing. How old is your kernel? > You *are* able to continue, right? Everything else works for me. I didn't test with my kernel; I tested with almost-current SMP and !SMP kernels (amost-current = 217 lines of patches; my kernel = 96934 lines of patches). They were about half an hour old when I tried it. I tested little more than continuing from Debugger(). I didn't test using optional foot shooting devices like acpi or modules. Bruce