From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 22:40:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3CB16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:40:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D222543D49 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:40:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k08Me618020622 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k08Me6xP020621; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:40:06 GMT Message-Id: <200601082240.k08Me6xP020621@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Andrew P." Cc: Subject: Re: ports/91533: ports www/linux-firefox open file problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:40:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/91533; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Andrew P." To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, samm@os2.kiev.ua Cc: Subject: Re: ports/91533: ports www/linux-firefox open file problem Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 01:39:33 +0300 Thanks for your report! Actually, this is a known problem which has been discussed on the mailing-list: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-December/027960.html The problem seems to be that the linux-gtk2 port is actually to old, but a newer gtk2 version would require an upgrade of the whole linux compatibility layer. I'm not ready to come up with a sound solution that wouldn't break hundreds of other ports. Another way around this might be to actually compile the linux version. I don't know why (almost?) all linux ports are binary. Some of them are proprietary and come without source, but the other ones are treated rather unfair. Sure as hell, it's a lot easier to make a binary port than a real one, but imho it's very wrong.