From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Dec 10 1:40:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.vnet.net (smtp2.vnet.net [166.82.1.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E998115217 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 01:40:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp2.vnet.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA02248; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 04:40:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA04222; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 04:40:16 -0500 (EST) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.3/8.6.9) id EAA74144; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 04:40:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 04:40:16 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199912100940.EAA74144@lakes.dignus.com> To: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, gwq_uk@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Bad Floppy causes Kernel Panic (3.4-RC) In-Reply-To: <19991209223956.5578.qmail@web1403.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmm... I was just thinking - BAD144 had been (or will be) removed from 4.0. But, as floppy sizes increase, with say, an LS120 - does it make sense to keep bad144 to handle filesystems here? - Just a thought - - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message