From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 19 07:09:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36E43B3FF3 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BWf623TF5z4JNT for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BWf603qgHzFdxM for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:09:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1597820952; bh=bsCmH2HED2HaM4IIC6deuKBE5K3QFJUiVm3+WdqenJ4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JbbAE6gsPF8pxx28tdthKNnRKP8CgdE4nD86CbYgLXGf5KtxIn2bi+PJli/kLN2qx OMrPBQZ80ocKB+oubBm568PllghFBg4zkMTs+7LjpEuBmuCwoCTokpAuHA9fUBbZWu XUf7uoNihWXCtklb1G0i+naPSbzntXRthM9H5K5M= X-Riseup-User-ID: 7E86CA87F14ADE6D83D52E3ECF9E7351C01D1B5734E98249A93E63BA2F585050 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BWf5z5ynmzJmmQ for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:09:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:09:09 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to build a package from local source keeping all the original used (gnu autotools) build options !?? Message-ID: <20200819090909.5c73d3c6@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <000701d675ee$fd65ecf0$f831c6d0$@xs4all.nl> References: <000001d67566$e2acd5a0$a80680e0$@xs4all.nl> <000701d67598$0c8aa560$259ff020$@xs4all.nl> <20200819041750.5784a1f9.freebsd@edvax.de> <000701d675ee$fd65ecf0$f831c6d0$@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BWf623TF5z4JNT X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=JbbAE6gs; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.16 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_EXCLAIM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.56)[-0.564]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:09:15 -0000 On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 08:07:15 +0200, louis.forums@xs4all.nl wrote: >Yep I am using outlook =F0=9F=98=8A doing ..... clever things ...... Not o= nly >outlook by the way ..... no idea what this forum mailing system is >doing, but the layout of the mail here is ..... terrible ..... not at >all the intended layout !! It's probably caused by a bad structure of a sentence done by you in the first place, in combination with a "smart" character replacement, when rendering the email for sending, without providing a preview of the rendered email before sending, done by Outlook. Some of the replacement chars are obviously even not included by the UTF-8 charset. They likely require a specific Microsoft font. I've never seen that the software (mailman 2) and it's settings used by this mailing list have changed the formatting or characters. For example, "......" probably was replaced by "=E2=80=A6=E2=80=A6", while = "....." 123123 12312 wasn't replaced.