From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 13 23:18:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED781065675 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:18:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E598FC12 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id pBDNIWMg038637; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:18:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1323818312; bh=/oLRpBcwEbZFs/r+XBpxJYbC38cNyy687jJrHOVjras=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FHRM91O8ST5MyF9KZuZHVOl7G118Yuhzse49NyAIJmRpMVbDNeWuoZ6wyij8KTPHX b58Mb6rAbbip4XAvajpxdXF0H0W6kw7GMyOm2TNqVjQ/gwkplWW0/gOvWhtuN8E+mm dHt9JB0Xb2en2VEBncj+RGud2yA2Yo78Rdhzcf30= From: Sean Bruno To: Rick Macklem In-Reply-To: <1606093949.138320.1323791595198.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <1606093949.138320.1323791595198.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:18:31 -0800 Message-ID: <1323818311.26931.20.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Current , Dimitry Andric Subject: Re: NFS + SVN problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:18:57 -0000 On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 07:53 -0800, Rick Macklem wrote: > Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2011-11-23 19:26, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 09:58 -0800, Rick Macklem wrote: > > >> I don't know if Dimitry tried this, but you could also try the > > >> "nolockd" option, so that byte range locking is done locally in > > >> the client and avoids the NLM. > > >> > > >> Good luck with it and please let us know how it goes, rick > > > > > > This seems to allow SVN 1.7 to do whatever nonsense it is trying to > > > do. > > > I've modified my fstab on the test host in the cluster to: > > > > > > dumpster:/vol/volshscratch /dumpster/scratch nfs > > > rw,soft,intr,bg,nolockd,nosuid 0 0 > > > > > > Removing soft,intr had no effect. This, I suspect will be > > > problematic > > > for clusteradm@ if we start updating hosts in the cluster. > > > > A very late addition to this: I got Subversion 1.7 to work properly > > over > > NFSv3, by making sure rpc.lockd runs on both server and client. > > > > E.g, set rpc_lockd_enable to YES in rc.conf; this is off by default, > > even if you have nfs_client_enable/nfs_server_enable set to YES. > > and rpc_statd_enable="YES" on all systems, as well. > > > ________________ Thanks for this btw. :-) Sean