From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  1 19:21:57 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584F3C3E
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  1 May 2013 19:21:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC37104A
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  1 May 2013 19:21:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id e11so2311402iej.16
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 01 May 2013 12:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=Yqj5oyCbcjftuuHTaRSMVRoyZaxBtsr3wLYCf+b/eUg=;
 b=KNROY8cAUQ3uV6ZKf4DaZTM78GVsq9+9QHZYIpPiNwnA2qm8kZ+giTLbEBLqWbMwoS
 ym1g6zXcKvm8HQh2ywZcS82ST3O+oZ0L3mCZar6SSBEB3fJGPdJsMOzBu5H4Wk9EivdM
 M1mnpxk9piWb5g7IHWPlzriJoJ1Xq7GQXd3OuYWBjTJLWUEG6RbjSk3JjCX+fkRNN6dT
 jD9G6KfW26ps8oo4JHoivTatskc9uKr0uZKF77+g9d++jT5/MQFbADhZ5+Hl/B6leJ63
 /keqwSq/eSfT9ImJCnpz+MaR5QoBP+w5z8M3JwgYLjOrDLeQW0F4JkLajnNJghJJA5NV
 OLoQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.42.165 with SMTP id p5mr13892205igl.75.1367436116952;
 Wed, 01 May 2013 12:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.58.52 with HTTP; Wed, 1 May 2013 12:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.58.52 with HTTP; Wed, 1 May 2013 12:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1786370.b1sXK5t6Pv@pcoliver.heesakkers.info>
References: <20130430103821.GJ3577@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
 <1786370.b1sXK5t6Pv@pcoliver.heesakkers.info>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 20:21:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CADLo838bv+_4utPFEzHHPsR3n-vtx+dHyseXo6eW+cbH9F+H+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORM] shebang fixing framework
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To: Oliver Heesakkers <freebsd@heesakkers.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 19:21:57 -0000

On 1 May 2013 20:18, "Oliver Heesakkers" <freebsd@heesakkers.info> wrote:
>
> Op di 30 apr 2013 12:38:21 schreef Baptiste Daroussin:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152we
> > are looking for a framework/helpers to help patching scripts shebang so
> > that they fit where the interpreters is on FreeBSD.
> >
> (...)
>
> In there you wrote a patch using /usr/bin/env. Why not stick with that?
I'm
> quite fond of this technique as it's clean and portable.
>
> Portability might not be that important when working on a fix for ports
alone,
> but still makes sense to me.

On the contrary, it teaches good habits to people.

Writing portable code also means it's less likely to break.

Chris