From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Sep 2 1:14:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from maildns2.fsbdial.co.uk (s24.athenenet.co.uk [195.89.137.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8215C14D5D for ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 01:14:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frankrj@netscape.net) Received: from [212.1.149.175] by maildns2.freenet.co.uk (NTMail 4.30.0012/NT0619.00.9914eb79) with ESMTP id ijlqoaaa for ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 09:11:58 +0100 Message-ID: <37CE3247.A5737A85@netscape.net> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 09:16:07 +0100 From: Francis Jordan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa Cc: Chuck O'Donnell , freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Purpose of irq's in pcic References: <199909020103.KAA00678@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa wrote: > > > pcic0: rev 0x01 int a irq 11 on pcic0.3.0 > > pcic1: rev 0x01 int b irq 11 on pcic0.3.1 > > > PC-Card VLSI 82C146 (5 mem & 2 I/O windows) > > TI's CardBus controller and VLSI PCIC have same ID, but thses are > incompatible. Hmmm, I also have the TI-1131 misidentified as "VLSI", but I wouldn't go as far as to say that these are incompatible. My 3Com589D works absolutely fine with this controller on -current. > You should be use PAO, PAO's pcic support code has already fixed this problem. Well, shouldn't someone be merge it into -current? :-) Now, seriously, I know that Warner is slowly (and hopefully surely) converting PAO's newconfig code to newbus, but maybe some parts can be merged in earlier? Frank To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message