From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 30 17:01:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE42416A420; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D74113C457; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C840020E0; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:01:24 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.7/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D832090; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:01:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B508E84537; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:15:38 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Doug Barton References: <86d4rn1kln.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86sl0jywii.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86abmryun9.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080127213851.506zunyhwwg4wsgs@webmail.leidinger.net> <479CFD3B.6020806@dlr.de> <479D745C.3090207@FreeBSD.org> <86zluqut6n.fsf@ds4.des.no> <479E5ECE.5080107@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:15:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <479E5ECE.5080107@FreeBSD.org> (Doug Barton's message of "Mon\, 28 Jan 2008 15\:01\:34 -0800") Message-ID: <86y7a8a1et.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Alexander Leidinger , Hartmut Brandt , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: resolver change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:01:33 -0000 Doug Barton writes: > Ok, then Robert is right, we need a tcpdump to figure out what's > happening here. I think what's happening is that there have been unannounced changes in the NTP pool's DNS implementation... so we can stand down the National Guard, I f***ed up, nothing to see, move along... Stuff changed, I incorrectly assumed that it hadn't and misinterpreted the output from the tools I used to verify that assumption, everything worked fine after this was explained to me on the timekeepers mailing list and I fixed my configuration, and I'm very embarrassed... I think I'll go fall on my sword now before I screw up anything else :) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no