From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 13 20:01:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D721D16A4D7; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:01:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1E88043D41; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:01:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6DK1Dma024062;
	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:01:13 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:54:38 MDT."
             <40F43DFE.3000402@freebsd.org> 
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:01:13 +0200
Message-ID: <24061.1089748873@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/kldunload kldunload.8 kldunload.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:01:15 -0000

In message <40F43DFE.3000402@freebsd.org>, Scott Long writes:

>It typically won't be duplicated.  This particular work is good for
>things like GEOM modules that don't fit into newbus.  If at some point
>in the future newbus becomes aware of pseudo-drivers (drivers not
>attached by a hardware bus) then this should indeed be revisited.

I wish I could grasp from where this "newbus fits all" attiude
comes, I certainly see nothing anywhere that could explain it.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.