From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 3 10:54:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA22147 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 10:54:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA22142 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 10:54:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sef@kithrup.com) Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA28895; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 10:54:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sef) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 10:54:13 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Eric Fagan Message-Id: <199804031854.KAA28895@kithrup.com> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: error when compiling kernel with SOFTUPDATES In-Reply-To: <2912.891628822.kithrup.freebsd.current@critter.freebsd.dk> References: Your message of "Fri, 03 Apr 1998 10:23:11 -0800." <199804031823.KAA25869@kithrup.com> Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <2912.891628822.kithrup.freebsd.current@critter.freebsd.dk> PHK writes: >>In article <1291.891594980.kithrup.freebsd.current@critter.freebsd.dk> PHK wr >>ites: >>>I don't need an excuse for saying "no". >> >>That's right. Whatever PHK does is right, and if anyone objects, they're >>wrong. > >1. No > >2. but they had better have their arguments lined up and in order > >3. As you well know. Pay attention: If you disagree with PHK, and tell him so, he will ignore you. If you say you think it should be done a better way, he will say "no." And nothing more. As he himself says: "I don't need an excuse for saying 'no'." And his justification for his behaviour is "I'm on core, and you're not, so you have to do what I say." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message