From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 25 03:51:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF97ADD4F1 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 03:51:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468351C7B for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 03:51:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 45E04ADD4F0; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 03:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458A5ADD4EF for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 03:51:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F33071C71 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 03:51:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C43CD7883; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:51:31 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received:received :received; s=selector1; t=1458877890; x=1460692291; bh=HWpi6LbNg 4CsAhfNey/K+DN9V+OnMHU/+U69Qr/p8ss=; b=mjExBqhWhfaq57c3BwXZm8gYW ZI4/aIVnr3Lm98Vp7XbBdyTbpWicq8pwty7dyBxRRf1RJQQfUvwzDqC2pa0o2iQW nPwIqMPV4QV2zzngymkbsdqePxwh05KxIcrukYdwgbuWCsVz8GRz+ix2mhHCAvHC tD4siXTXP4sYqEq51k= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id cZA5EWm3itt2; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:51:30 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4422BD7882; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:51:30 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u2P3pTeq099937; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:51:29 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th) From: Olivier Nicole To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Cc: luzar722@gmail.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anti-virus for FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <44909.128.135.52.6.1458829510.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> (galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:51:29 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 03:51:40 -0000 Valeri, > In many setups (when someone is using amavis) spamassassin just works > under the same hood of amawis together with one or another virus > scanner. Agreed, and that's the way I use it. But anti-virus and anti-spam tackle very different needs, different logic, different way of solving the problem. That's when confusing them both that you end up with horribly bloated software, that consumes way too much resources and become unmanageable. Not to mention it does not help the users to get a clear image of how their system is working. bets regards, Olivier