From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 7 17:30:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF51A16A420 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:30:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B3743D4C for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:30:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE561A4E64; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:30:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 831BA514BD; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:30:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:30:30 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Chad Whitacre Message-ID: <20060307173030.GA15637@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060303153833.Q557@10.0.0.1> <440CB329.10403@zetaweb.com> <20060306221359.GA53283@xor.obsecurity.org> <440D9F9B.1060008@zetaweb.com> <20060307162614.GA64610@xor.obsecurity.org> <440DC257.6040204@zetaweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <440DC257.6040204@zetaweb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Jeff Roberson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: VFS MFC testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:30:37 -0000 --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:26:47PM -0500, Chad Whitacre wrote: > Kris, >=20 > >No, the rsync (i.e. activity on the filesystem) is important. >=20 > Yeah, just ran a test w/o it actually. We are planning to run a test w/= =20 > some disk activity later this afternoon. I suppose the more activity,=20 > the more likely to see the bug, eh? Yes. FYI, I am fairly confident this is fixed, because I make extensive use of mount/umount+filesystem activity, and I am no longer seeing problems like this. Kris --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEDcM2Wry0BWjoQKURAld2AJ9FSxVipAdBQJ33o3mlOTvkv4p5bQCfTfXk XMSTM5lcA4Mb5jvHJFDDwFc= =aJ5y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--