From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jun 10 3:14:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B232437BC3C for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 03:14:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jesper@skriver.dk) Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 43FA73E4B; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 12:14:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 12:14:16 +0200 From: Jesper Skriver To: Carroll Kong Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IP over ATM Message-ID: <20000610121416.D96263@skriver.dk> References: <4.2.2.20000609225805.0377f640@email.eden.rutgers.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000609225805.0377f640@email.eden.rutgers.edu>; from damascus@eden.rutgers.edu on Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 10:59:45PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 10:59:45PM -0500, Carroll Kong wrote: > I noticed we have ip over atm options in the kernel. Can I use freebsd to > act as an ATM router? And, can I do multicast over ip over atm? I think > the current fore systems switches we have cannot do it. Either that or > some other weird flunky brand we got. Also, I know it is better to get > solid hardware that can do this, how well can freebsd act as a ATM router > (high end scale?). I know Poul-Henning Kamp has some experience with this, I think it's for unicast IP traffic, but it seems to work fine. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message