From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 16:26:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC6837B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:26:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spam2.snu.ac.kr (spam2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.10.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EB2E43F85 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:26:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lahaye@users.sourceforge.net) Received: (snipe 31908 invoked by alias); 5 May 2003 23:40:29 -0000 Received: from lahaye@users.sourceforge.net with Spamsniper2.0 (Processed in 0.141006 secs); Received: from unknown (HELO sis1.snu.ac.kr) (147.46.10.36) by 0 with SMTP; 5 May 2003 23:40:29 -0000 X-RCPTTO: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Received: from users.sourceforge.net ([147.46.44.183]) by sis1.snu.ac.kr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h45NPC2j087240 for ; Tue, 6 May 2003 08:25:13 +0900 Message-ID: <3EB6F33E.3040108@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 08:26:54 +0900 From: Rob Lahaye Organization: Seoul National University - South Korea User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ko-kr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portupgrade: installed package "succeeds port" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 23:26:32 -0000 Hello, I have started using portupgrade package recently and it is indeed a wonderful package compared to so basic ports handling by standard FreeBSD software, that I wonder why portupgrade is not by default part of the basic FreeBSD OS. Anyway, when I install from ports with portupgrade, I get packages listed as follows: mplayer-gtk-0.90.0.110_1 > succeeds port (port has 0.90.0.110) portupgrade-20030427 > succeeds port (port has 20030308_2) ruby-1.6.8.2003.04.19 > succeeds port (port has 1.6.8.2003.01.19) ruby-bdb1-0.1.9 > succeeds port (port has 0.1.8) ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.0.p2.2003.04.19 > succeeds port (port has 1.8.0.p2) I'm sure I am in sync with the port, neverless it says that my installed packages succeeds the port. Is that a bug in portupgrade package? Regards, Rob.