From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 20:30:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A88216A4CE for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:30:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA0943D49 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:30:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.208] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CZEdQ-0002pB-00; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:30:04 +0100 Received: from [84.128.137.129] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CZEdP-0002xp-00; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:30:03 +0100 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:30:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <41AC571E.2020503@jrv.org> <41ACBEDF.3020001@jrv.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6054756.bIHUBdL3ML"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411302130.42147.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 cc: "James R. Van Artsalen" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 routing IPFW FWD'd packets? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:30:06 -0000 --nextPart6054756.bIHUBdL3ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 30 November 2004 20:26, Achim Patzner wrote: <...> > Would you please have one with > > * $FreeBSD: src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c,v 1.225.2.5 2004/10/03 > 17:04:40 mlaier Exp $ > > as he probably broke it (as far as I remember he is merrily ipf-ing > around). Okay, this is cheap! 1) The problem above was introduced in rev. 1.225.2.4 (not my fault!). 2) I have done many good to IPFW lately. For instance, IPFW wouldn't be MPs= afe=20 if I didn't merge the MT_TAG removal. 3) It's PF (packet filter) and it's working great - go figure! =46ix should be on the list already. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart6054756.bIHUBdL3ML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBrNhyXyyEoT62BG0RAjpzAJ9AUtrM+foXnvj//uJPQwF1+A4QAACcCgt7 TkVre6V686MlxY9m/DUJabY= =dW3t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6054756.bIHUBdL3ML--