From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 19:47:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B37616A41F; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:47:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282CF43D45; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:47:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [192.168.253.24] (206-135-69-234.lax-e100.cust.gw.epoch.net [206.135.69.234]) by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j9IJlUxq017454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:47:31 -0700 Message-ID: <4355514A.5000703@root.org> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:47:22 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Oppermann References: <69576.1129658248@critter.freebsd.dk> <435543AD.283EC0D@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <435543AD.283EC0D@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp , src-committers@freebsd.org, Andrew Gallatin , cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 cpu_switch.S machdep.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:47:38 -0000 Andre Oppermann wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >>In message <435527DD.3040007@root.org>, Nate Lawson writes: >> >> >>>I have good information that in the near future, most designs will have >>>guaranteed synchronized TSC across all CPUs. >> >>...and when those chips arrive, we can hopefully identify them by some >>bit in some MSR and then we can use the TSC on them. >> >>This is a good move and it is only too bad that it's taken the chip >>manufacturers 10 years to figure this out. > > > Considering that Nate knows about it and that it took cpu manufacturers > so I suspect they did it to make some DRM schemes work. Nah, ACPI tables on new machines tend to give info about what major OS vendors will soon support. -- Nate