From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 25 17:22:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A6516A41F for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: from ratchet.nebcorp.com (ratchet.nebcorp.com [205.217.153.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF99E43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: by ratchet.nebcorp.com (Postfix, from userid 1014) id 86722D9823; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:22:58 -0700 From: Danny Howard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050725172258.GZ24353@ratchet.nebcorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu Subject: Crypto Accelerators? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:22:59 -0000 Hello, Does anyone have suggestions as to preferred hardware crypto accelerators? I want to improve performance of our SSL-based web application, and making it easier for the web server to spew encrypted ought to help. :) Based on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html#CRYPTO-ACCEL and the notes at http://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html#hardware I get the impression that the Broadcom stuff is probably best, as they have had the friendliest history of driver support, and there are a bunch of different cards listed under the FreeBSD page. Anyone like to confirm or amend this impression? Vouch for a particular card? Thanks, -danny